SB1 - Evaluation

Overall I was really happy with the way in which we hit the criteria for the brief. Although I was very apologetic to staff members who had to deal with the consequences of the project. We set a plan that would notify all that the project was fake to prevent any misunderstandings with Belgrave - however we didn’t take into account that people wouldn’t check their emails or read the poster properly which states that you could only get the free drink and burger with a confirmation email. That emailing being the one that let them know it’s all a lie. If I were to go back and do this project again I would look at ways in which any form of misunderstanding could be eliminated, e.g have the sign in page show that it was fake straight after signing in.

The brief was only for the one week with the presentation at the end, and the result of this outcome was really successful. During the project I was the team leader, and really took control of the brief, giving everyone roles and jobs to do during the week. The design work was all done by me, which I think if I were to approach again I would have other team members collaborate on the design process for fair work load. The presentation was created by me as I held all the information - so one criticism I would have for myself is to not do all the work and evenly distribute it to all team members, especially those who didn’t contribute at all.  However, I was very satisfied with the outcome, and knowing it was all down to me. I did go a bit to far with making the offer more convincing by going all in and changing my adobe name to Belgrave LAU Offer to stop my name being showing on the LAU site.

The brief was a great way to show that if design and research can be executed well design can be easily considered as believable - it was a great reminder that I can design work that is usable for professional purposes.